Turkey's path to dictatorship
By Orhan Kemal Cengiz
Armed with his Justice and Development Party's (AKP) stunning Nov. 1 election victory, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is revisiting his goal of replacing the country's parliamentary government with an executive presidency.
Will Erdogan’s zeal for a presidential system lead to fresh
blows to Turkey’s critical media, which is already in an oxygen tent?
Could the unprecedented pressure on the media in recent months stem from
an intention to gag dissenting voices ahead of a referendum on a
presidential system?
In sum, the revival of the presidential system debate has ignited a serious controversy and raised new alarming questions for Turkey.
Οι απόψεις του ιστολογίου μπορεί να μην συμπίπτουν με τα περιεχόμενα του άρθρου
Armed with his Justice and Development Party's (AKP) stunning Nov. 1 election victory, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is revisiting his goal of replacing the country's parliamentary government with an executive presidency.
In the previous elections, held June 7, the rival Peoples’
Democratic Party (HDP) emphasized and berated Erdogan's intentions. “We
won’t let you become an executive president!” was the main slogan the
pro-Kurdish HDP used then. It was perhaps the most memorable slogan of
the entire election campaign. The message was so influential that the
HDP mustered 13.2% of the vote, backed by a remarkable number of voters
who chose to support the party for the first time. Those people
apparently were worried that an HDP failure to obtain the 10% national
threshold would give the AKP a super-majority in parliament and allow it
to change the constitution to install a presidential system.
Erdogan has long argued that Turkey should abandon the parliamentary system in favor of a presidential one equipped with strong executive powers
for the head of state. Many fear that Erdogan's proposed presidential
regime would mark the beginning of an irreversible path to dictatorship.
The big losses the AKP suffered in the June 7 polls seemed to be linked
to Erdogan’s portrayal of the vote as a sort of a plebiscite for a
presidential system. AKP leaders must have come to the same conclusion,
for they made no mention of the presidential system in the ensuing snap
elections Nov. 1.
Yet, the presidential system debate made a quick comeback to Turkey’s
agenda after the AKP scored a sweeping victory Nov. 1, garnering 49.4%
of the vote. AKP representatives immediately argued that the
presidential system should be opened to discussion. On Nov. 4, Erdogan’s
spokesman, Ibrahim Kalin, made the clearest statement so far that
constitutional amendments introducing a presidential system could be put to a referendum.
Such a move would require the support of at least 330 of the 550
parliament members, while the AKP has only 317 seats. HDP
representatives, however, have signaled
the party is open to talks on a presidential system, backpedaling from
their June 7 slogan. This raises the prospect of negotiations and
bargaining on a presidential system, linked to revived settlement talks
with the Kurds, involving issues such as house arrest for jailed Kurdish
rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan, with the HDP playing a key role in the
process.
Yet, a bargaining link to a settlement of the Kurdish problem does
not mean the introduction of a presidential system would contribute to
democracy in Turkey. A failed parliamentary process for a new
constitution has already shown what the AKP has in mind. A draft constitution
the party submitted to parliament in 2013 aimed to equip the president
with powers and duties hardly seen elsewhere in the world.
Under the AKP’s proposed presidential system, the head of
state would have the power to issue executive and legislative decrees,
which effectively would mean that both the executive and legislative
powers would be concentrated in the president’s hands. Parliament would
retain its legislative function, but the president would have veto power
over the laws it passes. Moreover, parliament would need a three-fifths
majority to override a veto and pass it for a second time. The
president would appoint the ministers and half of the members of higher
courts, and would have the power to dissolve parliament. Unlike other
presidential systems, the one proposed by the AKP stipulates that
presidential and parliamentary elections be held simultaneously.
According to prominent law professor and lecturer Levent Koker, the
idea of holding both elections on the same day is designed to ensure
that the president and the dominant party in parliament are of the same political stripe.
Professor Ergun Ozbudun, one of Turkey’s top constitutional scholars,
is also seriously concerned about the AKP’s intentions. He said
the AKP proposal amounts to “one-man rule with no mechanism of checks and balances.”
But analyzing the AKP’s presidential system hypothetically
on paper may not be the best way. One has to take into account also the
state of affairs on the ground. In a country where press freedom has hit
a deplorable low and judicial independence is constantly on the wane,
the question looms: Who can check and balance a strongman sitting at the
heart of the system?
Concerns are further aggravated by how AKP supporters
interpret the idea. Take, for instance, Abdurrahman Dilipak, a columnist
for the pro-government Yeni Akit daily and a prominent voice in the
Islamist community. In a striking speech at a gathering in Canada last
month, Dilipak said Erdogan would become a “caliph”
if elected head of state under a presidential system, and
representatives of nations affiliated with the caliphate would have
offices in his presidential palace.
A public opinion poll conducted
after the Nov. 1 election found that 31% of Turks support
the presidential system, while 57% favor continuing the parliamentary
one. The result seems in line with the outcome of the June 7 elections,
when the AKP lost its parliamentary majority after campaigning with the
presidential system as a central issue.
Only days before the Nov. 1 election, police raided the
offices of Koza Ipek Holding, and pro-government trustees were appointed
to manage its media group. The two newspapers and two television
channels, which used to be vocal government critics, turned into AKP
propaganda machines overnight.
In sum, the revival of the presidential system debate has ignited a serious controversy and raised new alarming questions for Turkey.
Οι απόψεις του ιστολογίου μπορεί να μην συμπίπτουν με τα περιεχόμενα του άρθρου
Labels
English Articles
Ισως να σας ενδιαφερουν...
Γράψτε τα δικά σας σχόλια
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια :
Θα σας παρακαλούσα να είστε κόσμιοι στους χαρακτηρισμούς σας, επειδή είναι δυνατόν επισκέπτες του ιστολογίου να είναι και ανήλικοι.
Τα σχόλια στα blogs υπάρχουν για να συνεισφέρουν οι αναγνώστες στο διάλογο. Η ευθύνη των σχολίων (αστική και ποινική) βαρύνει τους σχολιαστές.
Τα σχόλια θα εγκρίνονται μόνο όταν είναι σχετικά με το θέμα, δεν αναφέρουν προσωπικούς, προσβλητικούς χαρακτηρισμούς, καθώς επίσης και τα σχόλια που δεν περιέχουν συνδέσμους.
Επίσης, όταν μας αποστέλλονται κείμενα (μέσω σχολίων ή ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου), παρακαλείσθε να αναγράφετε τυχούσα πηγή τους σε περίπτωση που δεν είναι δικά σας. Ευχαριστούμε για την κατανόησή σας...